Senate Policy on Academic Honesty
A. Introduction
Conduct that violates the ethical or legal standards
of the University community or of one's program or specialization
may result in serious consequences. The Policy on Academic Honesty
is a reaffirmation and clarification for members of the University
of the general obligation to maintain the highest standards of academic
honesty. It outlines the general responsibility of faculty to foster
acceptable standards of academic conduct and of the student to be
mindful of and abide by such standards.
B. The Role of Faculty Members and Students
A clear sense of academic honesty and responsibility
is fundamental to good scholarship. Faculty members should include
consideration of academic honesty in both courses and research settings.
Such guidance is particularly important for students who assume
independent roles as course assistants or begin to conduct their
own original work. Every student has a responsibility to abide by
these standards and, when in doubt, to consult with faculty members
in order to determine a proper course of action.
C. Pressures that May Lead to Academic Misconduct
University education includes demands that might
tempt some to violate standards of academic honesty. There are pressures
on students to achieve high grades, obtain financial support, meet
research or publication deadlines, gain recognition from the scholarly
community, and secure employment. Although faculty members can help
students to maintain academic honesty despite these pressures, each
student has final responsibility for her or his academic honesty.
D. Serious Offences Against the Standards of Academic Honesty
Note: This summary is not exhaustive. In some
cases the University regulations on non-academic discipline may
apply. Some academic offences constitute offences under the Criminal
Code of Canada; a student charged under University regulations may
also be subject to criminal charges. Charges may also be laid against
York University students for matters which arise at other educational
institutions.
Cheating: Cheating is the attempt to gain
an improper advantage in an academic evaluation. Among the forms
this kind of dishonesty can take are; obtaining a copy of an examination
before it is officially available or learning an examination question
before it is officially available; copying another person's answer
to an examination question; consulting an unauthorized source during
an examination; obtaining assistance by means of documentary, electronic
or other aids which are not approved by the instructor; or changing
a score or a record of an examination result.
It is also improper to submit the work one has
done for one class or project to a second class, or as a second
project, without getting the informed consent of the relevant instructors.
Acceptance of one piece of work that is submitted for two classes
must be arranged beforehand. It is understood that students may
wish to build on previous research in the preparation of a paper
but students must also be aware that such a practice may run afoul
of the intention of the assignment. In all such cases the student
must discuss the matter with the instructors and receive written
permission beforehand.
Impersonation: It is a breach of academic
honesty to have someone impersonate one's self in class, in a test
or examination, or in connection with any other type of assignment
in a course. Both the impersonator and the individual impersonated
may be charged.
Plagiarism and other misappropriation of the
work of another: Plagiarism is the representation of another
person's ideas or writing as one's own. The most obvious form of
this kind of dishonesty is the presentation of all or part of another
person's published work as something one has written. However, paraphrasing
another's writing without proper acknowledgement may also be considered
plagiarism. It is also a violation of academic honesty to represent
another's artistic or technical work or creation as one's own. Just
as there are standards to which one must adhere in the preparation
and publication of written works, there are standards to which one
must adhere in the creation and presentation of music, drawings,
designs, dance, photography and other artistic and technical works.
In different forms, these constitute a theft of someone else's work.
This is not to say that students should not use the work of others
with the proper acknowledgement.
Improper research practices: Many academic
activities may involve the collecting, analyzing, interpreting and
publishing of information or data obtained in the scientific laboratory
or in the field. Opportunities to deviate from acceptable standards
may be more numerous in research than in the classroom, as research
activities may be supervised less closely. Forms of improper research
practices include the dishonest reporting of investigative results
either through fabrication or falsification, taking or using the
research results of others without permission or due acknowledgment,
misrepresentation of research results or the methods used, the selective
reporting or omission of conflicting information or data to support
a particular notion or hypothesis. Furthermore, all researchers
have a responsibility to refrain from practices that may unfairly
inhibit the research of others now or later. This responsibility
extends to York University students in other institutions or countries.
Dishonesty in publication: In most instances
the objective of scholarly research is the dissemination of information,
usually in the form of a written and published work. Indeed, in
many disciplines career advancement is often based largely on the
number and quality of an individual's publications. It is a violation
of academic honesty to knowingly publish information that will mislead
or deceive readers. This includes the falsification or fabrication
of data or information, as well as the failure to give credit to
collaborators as joint authors or the listing as authors of others
who have not contributed to the work. Plagiarism is also considered
a form of dishonesty in publication.
Premature oral or written dissemination of
information: Information or experimental data that was collected
with a member of the faculty or another student, and other works
that involved the participation of a faculty member or another student
should not be submitted for publication prematurely, without appropriate
permission.
Abuse of confidentiality: A student may
be asked to help in the evaluation of confidential grant proposals,
award applications, or manuscripts that will be or may have been
submitted for possible funding or publication. Taking or releasing
the ideas or data of others that were given with the expectation
that they are confidential is inappropriate. Unless one is authorized
to do so, it is improper to obtain a password assigned to another
or to copy or modify a data file or program belonging to someone
else. Proper authorization means being granted permission either
by the owner or originator of that material, or by a faculty member,
or an appropriate administrator. Similarly, one should not violate
the integrity of a computer system to harass another user or operator,
damage software or hardware or evade appropriate monetary charges.
Falsification or unauthorized modification
of an academic record: It is a breach of academic honesty to
falsify, fabricate, or in any other way modify a student examination,
transcript, grade, letter of recommendation, or related document.
Other breaches of academic honesty include making false claims or
statements, submitting false information, altering official documents
or records, attempting or causing others to do or attempt any of
the above, with intent to mislead an instructor, an academic unit,
program, office or committee as to a students academic status, qualifications,
actions or preparation. Failure to divulge previous attendance at
another postsecondary educational institution on an admissions application
is also a violation.
Obstruction of the academic activities of
another: It is a violation of academic honesty to interfere
with the scholarly activities of another in order to harass or gain
unfair academic advantage. This includes interference or tampering
with experimental data, with a human or animal subject, with a written
or other creation (e.g. a painting, sculpture or film), with a chemical
used for scientific study, or with any other object of study.
Aiding or abetting academic misconduct:
Knowingly aiding or abetting anyone in a breach of academic honesty
shall itself be considered misconduct. This may include assisting
others in the preparation of work submitted for appraisal or offering
for sale essays or other assignments with the intention that these
works would be submitted for appraisal.
E. Sanctions for Academic Misconduct
When verified, a violation of academic honesty
may lead to one or more of the following penalties:
(a) oral or written disciplinary warning or reprimand;
(b) a make-up assignment or examination;
(c) lower grade or failure on the assignment
or examination;
(d) failure in the course;
(e) suspension from the University for a definite
period1;
(f) notation on transcript2;
(g) withholding or rescinding a York degree, diploma or certificate3.
1 This penalty may be awarded only by a Faculty-level
committee which has received authority to do so from a Faculty Council.
2 A student may petition to the Senate Appeals
Committee to have the notation removed after a period of five years
from the date at which the notation was entered.
3 Where a Faculty decides to rescind a degree,
diploma or certificate, the decision, with supporting documentation,
must be forwarded to the Senate Appeals Committee for approval on
behalf of Senate.
A permanent record of the offence will be placed
in the student's academic file. This record is for internal academic
purposes only.
|