Policy on Academic Honesty
Definitions
Student Work: Fine arts student work covered
by rules regarding academic honesty includes papers, research, tests,
examinations and all forms of studio and production work as practised
within the Faculty.
Breaches of academic honesty: Please consult
the Senate Policy on Academic Honesty for a discussion of academic
honesty and definitions of breach of academic honesty. Among other
things the senate policy discusses offences such as cheating; submission
of one piece of work in satisfaction of two assignments without
prior informed consent; impersonation; plagiarism and other misappropriation
of the work of another; abuse of confidentiality; falsification
or forgery of documents; obstruction of the academic activities
of another; aiding or abetting academic misconduct; failure to divulge
previous attendance at another postsecondary educational institution
on an admissions application etc. In particular, students taking
courses in the Faculty of Fine Arts should be mindful of the dangers
of misappropriation and misrepresentation which are breaches of
academic honesty.
Misappropriation of another's work: In
the creation and presentation of all studio and performance work,
and all other artistic and technical works, students who use the
work of others must clearly state the extent and nature of the appropriation
to their instructor. Failure to do so shall constitute a breach
of academic honesty.
Misrepresentation of collaborative projects:
Failure to give appropriate credit to collaborators, or the
listing of others as collaborators who have not contributed to the
work, shall constitute a breach of academic honesty.
Procedures
a. The Senate Policy on Academic Honesty governs
the procedure of the Faculty in cases of alleged breaches of academic
honesty.
b. Any faculty member suspecting that a student
has engaged in a breach of academic honesty shall notify the associate
dean who shall in turn assist the faculty member in following the
procedures provided in the senate policy.
c. The associate dean of the Faculty shall be
the Faculty person responsible for the carriage of all cases of
breaches of academic honesty.
d. The Committee on Administrative Affairs shall
be the body responsible for hearing cases of breaches of academic
honesty and imposing penalties.
Procedural Guidelines
a. If an instructor believes an offence has occurred,
the student should be sent a notice in writing from the instructor
or course director that an offence is suspected, and that the instructor
or course director wishes to meet with the student. The student
will be informed that a representative may accompany her/him and
that the meeting will be on the record. A deadline for responding
of no less than seven calendar days will be imposed. The student
will also be informed that the course in question may not be dropped
(as per Senate Policy, E 4). Further procedures as defined in Senate
Policy, item D 3, a and b will apply.
b. Following the meeting, the instructor or course
director who decides to pursue the matter will send the following
material to the associate dean's office:
- i. the contested piece of work, (if possible);
- ii. the evidence supporting the alleged offence;
- iii. the record of the meeting;
- iv. the course syllabus and relevant assignment sheets;
- v. any handout on academic offences;
- vi. record of student's performance in the course to date;
- vii. student's written admission of guilt and joint recommendation
of instructor and student as to penalty, if applicable;
- viii. any other relevant materials.
If the student chooses not to attend the aforementioned
meeting, this material will be sent after the time limit for arranging
that meeting has expired.
c. The associate dean will present the case to
the Committee on Administrative Affairs, which is the relevant committee
empowered to hear such cases and to impose penalties. All further
procedures as defined in the senate policy will be followed.
Penalties
When a student has been found to have committed
a breach of academic honesty, without limiting the ultimate discretion
of the Faculty committee to impose any or all of the penalties set
out in the senate policy as may be warranted in the circumstances,
the committee may impose any or all of the following penalties:
a. a failure in the course;
b. failure in the course and a notation of breach
of academic honesty on the transcript;
c. suspension.
|