<York Calendars<Undergraduate
Calendar 2001-2002<Faculty of Pure
and Applied Science<Regulations Governing
Examinations and Academic Standards
Appeals Procedures
Appeals
by students and/or faculty members against rulings of the Petitions
Committee and/or the Committee on Examinations and Academic Standards
of the Faculty of Pure and Applied Science (with the exception of
appeals on academic dishonesty rulings - see below) must be filed
in writing with the Secretary of the Executive and Planning Committee
in the Office of the Dean, 108 Steacie, within 15 calendar days
of the date of notification of the decision.
Appeals
against rulings of the Petitions Committee and/or the Committee
on Examinations and Academic Standing will be heard by a panel of
two faculty members of the Executive and Planning Committee and
one student member selected from student members of the Faculty
Council. In the rare event that a decision of a panel of the Executive
and Planning Committee, or of the Senate Appeals Committee, requires
a completely new (de novo) hearing, the matter will be heard by
a panel of three faculty members of the Executive and Planning Committee
and one student member selected from student members of the Faculty
Council. These panels will be constituted, as required, from available
members, by the Secretary of the Executive and Planning Committee.
Members
shall disqualify themselves if they are involved as a party or witness
in the case, or believe that they could not be impartial. Where
members disqualify themselves, alternate members will replace them.
Appeals
are heard only on the following grounds:
- a)
new evidence; i.e. evidence that, through no fault of the appellant,
could not reasonably have been presented at an earlier level;
(As a guide, events or performance subsequent to the decisions
of the Petitions Committee and/or the Committee on Examinations
and Academic Standing are not to be construed as new evidence.)
- b)
evidence of procedural irregularity in the previous consideration
of the case by the Petitions Committee and/or the Committee on
Examinations and Academic Standing. This may be understood to
include actions taken by the Faculty of Pure and Applied Science,
its officers, committees or members with respect to the case which
would violate or nullify any of the following:
- normal
and written procedures of the Faculty;
- recognized
custom of the Faculty;
- the
principles of natural justice and fairness.
Students
and faculty members have the right to represent themselves at appeal
hearings to hear and answer allegations and to present their arguments.
Appeal hearings are not open to anyone not directly involved in
the case being considered. The committee's decision is taken in
camera.
All
appeal decisions are reported in writing to the students and the
faculty members concerned, the Office of Science Academic Services,
the home Faculty and the Office of the Registrar.
Further
appeals may be made to the Senate Appeals Committee. Enquiries about
these appeals, and the grounds upon which they may be filed, should
be directed to the Senate Office, S833 Ross.
Appeals
on academic dishonesty rulings are also made directly to the Senate
Appeals Committee. Appeals are heard only on the same grounds as
cited above.
|